Support local news in Alameda. Give Now!

Electrification and the Equitable Building Decarbonization Plan – Letter to the Editor

To the Editor:

Electrification is an important climate mitigation initiative. Since Alameda has its own electric utility that has been 100 percent renewable since 2020, Alameda is in a great position to be a leader.

Alameda Post - electrification

Given that there are already several trends increasing electrical demand, I think it’s especially important that Alameda focuses on supply initiatives, especially as we continue to have rolling blackouts when demand surges.

Some of the trends that will continue to increase demand:

  • Rapidly increasing affordability of electric vehicles.
  • Alameda’s Housing Element specifying 5,353 new housing units in the next eight years combined with the requirement they be all electric.
  • Corresponding retail structures and city infrastructure for new housing.
  • State and federal initiatives, like the Inflation Reduction Act.

Incentivizing is key

At this point in time, I suggest it’s more important that we incentivize supply creation. City simplification of the solar permit process is a good first step, but we have a long way to go to take advantage of the abundant sunlight we have in Alameda. We should incentivize home solar as well as moving forward with the Doolittle Solar Facility. We should incentivize battery adoption to store more of that power for the challenging 4 to 9 p.m. peak demand time.

Since Alameda’s greenhouse gas emissions from transportation are significantly higher than from homes, increasing home-charging access, including incentivizing electric panel upgrades and car-charging infrastructure for homes and multi-family apartments, should be a priority over other housing electrifying investments.

City incentives for full-home electrifying of existing homes and apartments should not yet be a priority because:

  • It can cost tens of thousands of dollars per dwelling.
  • It can displace renters, especially the most vulnerable.
  • Housing greenhouse gas emission is 27% versus 70% for transportation in Alameda.
  • We should address electricity availability and some of the other lower hanging fruit first.

I urge the Council to ask Staff for an alternative electrification plan that prioritizes increasing supply, starts with the most cost-effective measures, and doesn’t threaten the housing of our most vulnerable population.

Paul Beusterien,

Editor’s note: The Alameda Post received this letter that was submitted to the Mayor and City Council in regards to agenda item 7D at tonight’s City Council meeting. Paul Beusterien is a candidate for Alameda’s City Council 2022. You may reach him at [email protected].

Editorials and Letters to the Editor

All opinions expressed on this page are the author's alone and do not reflect those of the Alameda Post, nor does our organization endorse any views the author may present. Our objective as an independent news source is to fully reflect our community's varied opinions without giving preference to a particular viewpoint.

If you disagree with an opinion that we have published, please submit a rebuttal or differing opinion in a letter to the Editor for publication. Review our policies page for more information.

KQED Curated Content

Support our mission to provide trustworthy news and information for Alameda every day.

Thanks for reading the

Nonprofit news isn’t free.

Will you take a moment to support Alameda’s only local news source?