Council Restricts Remote Non-Agenda Public Comments
Beginning with the City Council meeting held Tuesday, November 21, public comment under Agenda Items 4 and 9—oral communications, non-agenda—will be allowed only from in-person attendees in Council Chambers at City Hall. Remote public comment will continue to be permitted for all other agenda items, including those on the Consent Calendar and Regular Agenda.
Alameda’s City Council Chambers, empty between meetings. Photo Adam Gillitt.
The change comes after several online speakers made anti-Semitic remarks during the November 7 Council meeting. After expressing shock at the first speaker, Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft denounced the hateful speech.
“I want to make it clear that as the Mayor of this City, and on behalf of Council and City staff, the comments you just heard do not comport at all with the values that we hold in Alameda, and we do not stand for anti-Semitism or any discrimination against any other people,” said Ashcraft.
Ashcraft interrupted a second speaker, but the third speaker’s rapid-fire statements—much like the first speaker—came near the end of his allotted two-minute timeframe, which hampered Council’s ability to cut him off.
Afterwards, City Attorney Yibin Shen reminded members of the public that general public comment should address topics “that are within the Council’s general jurisdiction, which is broad, but generally does not include international law.”
According to a statement on the City’s website, Alameda “will follow the lead of several other Bay Area cities” in limiting remote public comment. The change reflects the City’s “continuing efforts to create a community where Everyone belongs.”
Assemblymember Rob Bonta addresses City Council in one of their last in-person meetings from December, 2019. Still frame from city meeting video.
However, Shelby, a speaker during the November 21 Council meeting, expressed disappointment that little notice was given for the change. “The public didn’t have any participation in it, and it wasn’t held in open session—there was no vote. It’s a way that excludes the public even more.”
Will you take a moment to support Alameda’s only local news source?
Many people work together every day to bring you in-depth, unbiased, independent coverage of Alameda news and events. We rely on readers like you to make a donation to support this important work, and to help make it available for those who can’t contribute.
Council Restricts Remote Non-Agenda Public Comments
Beginning with the City Council meeting held Tuesday, November 21, public comment under Agenda Items 4 and 9—oral communications, non-agenda—will be allowed only from in-person attendees in Council Chambers at City Hall. Remote public comment will continue to be permitted for all other agenda items, including those on the Consent Calendar and Regular Agenda.
The change comes after several online speakers made anti-Semitic remarks during the November 7 Council meeting. After expressing shock at the first speaker, Mayor Marilyn Ezzy Ashcraft denounced the hateful speech.
“I want to make it clear that as the Mayor of this City, and on behalf of Council and City staff, the comments you just heard do not comport at all with the values that we hold in Alameda, and we do not stand for anti-Semitism or any discrimination against any other people,” said Ashcraft.
Ashcraft interrupted a second speaker, but the third speaker’s rapid-fire statements—much like the first speaker—came near the end of his allotted two-minute timeframe, which hampered Council’s ability to cut him off.
Related Articles
Afterwards, City Attorney Yibin Shen reminded members of the public that general public comment should address topics “that are within the Council’s general jurisdiction, which is broad, but generally does not include international law.”
According to a statement on the City’s website, Alameda “will follow the lead of several other Bay Area cities” in limiting remote public comment. The change reflects the City’s “continuing efforts to create a community where Everyone belongs.”
However, Shelby, a speaker during the November 21 Council meeting, expressed disappointment that little notice was given for the change. “The public didn’t have any participation in it, and it wasn’t held in open session—there was no vote. It’s a way that excludes the public even more.”
Ken Der is a contributing writer for the Alameda Post. Contact him via [email protected]. His writing is collected at AlamedaPost.com/Ken-Der.
KQED Curated Content
Recent Articles
Opinion: Cannabis Retail is a Surprising Force for Community Good in Alameda
The Post Celebrates Poetry Month: ‘The Ferry Ride Home’
F/A-18C Hornet Receives a Warm Welcome on the USS Hornet
AUSD Board Looks Ahead to New Gym and Classroom Cooling Solutions
Math Puzzle for April 25, 2025
Alameda PostCast for April 25, 2025
Court Dismisses Lawsuit Against New Alameda Point Food Bank Facility
AUSD Releases 23-24 Parcel Tax Reports
All Around Alameda – Get into the Swing of Spring
Today’s Alameda Treasure – 1620 Fourth Street, “Down Home,” Part 3
Two Birds from Alameda — April 24, 2025
New Stop Signs on Pacific Ave Launch Neighborhood Greenway