Support local news in Alameda. Give Now!

Alameda Point Economic Development is Stuck in the Past

It is no secret that the only way for the City to build the necessary new infrastructure at Alameda Point is by selling its property. Nevertheless, City leaders drag their feet, unable to let go of the broken strategy of leasing buildings to startup companies. It does not matter how promising or green a business is, leasing will never pay for infrastructure.

Alameda Post - hanger 11 at Alameda Point
Hanger 11 on the right with parking on “Shabby Alley,” aka Spirits Alley on Monarch St., which the City wants to lease instead of sell. Photo Richard Bangert.

Yet Building 11, a valuable hangar that sits at a key intersection for surrounding infrastructure upgrades, has been listed for lease rather than for sale. It is indicative of the City’s lackadaisical approach for redeveloping Alameda Point.

The current pace of infrastructure replacement has barely kept ahead of inflation and, if it continues at this pace, it will be another 40 to 50 years before all the new infrastructure, including a levee system, is in place. This could mean that one day, long before 40 years from now, Alamedans will be asked to pass an infrastructure bond so that the City can fulfill its responsibility to provide the promised new infrastructure.

Alameda Post - a building at Alameda Point that has been turned into leasable space, including Humble Sea brewing and apartments
Building 8 is Alameda Point’s sales success story. The building on Saratoga St. was unproductive until sold to the developer who renovated the building into the General Storehouse leasable spaces. Photo Richard Bangert.

Thanks for the memories, but time to move on

When the Navy base closed in 1997, the City began chasing the dream of having cutting-edge startup companies blossom in some of the old buildings, creating jobs, and eventually becoming successful enough to purchase the buildings. Unfortunately, leasing as a transitional strategy has fared poorly over the intervening 27 years.

A few of many examples come to mind, not to mention other hangars being leased on Spirits Alley. The Alameda International Electric Vehicle Exposition was staged at Alameda Point in 1998 with great fanfare. It was co hosted by CALSTART, whose mission was to jumpstart clean transportation technology by providing a shared work-space hub for 14 different business startups in Hangar 20 at the end of Monarch Street. A high-level federal delegation and local officials, as well as base workers and the general public, showed up for the lease-signing ceremony, according to this archived article. The enterprise was short-lived, however, and today the hangar is leased to Michaan’s Auctions, which could easily purchase that property.

There was also great fanfare in 2015 at the lease-signing ceremony for the promising electric powertrain company Wrightspeed at the Building 41 hangar across the street from Almanac Brewery. The mayor and city manager rode around the tarmac in an electric truck. “Wrightspeed’s relocation to Alameda Point is part of the trend that is fueling Alameda’s continuing growth as a hub of innovation in the alternative energy and advanced manufacturing sectors,” said City Manager John Russo was quoted in a January 20, 2015 company news release. “Moving to Hangar 41 will facilitate Wrightspeed’s creation of 280 new Bay Area jobs by 2018.” The company folded in 2023, leaving the contents of the hangar for the City to sell.

One of the most highly celebrated green tech companies was Makani, with their flying energy kite. You may have seen the novel aircraft being tested at Alameda Point. Makani’s energy kite showed promise in 2006 when the company signed a lease for part of the Air Traffic Control Tower, then added the Building 11 hangar across the street after being acquired by Google’s experimental division. In February 2020, Google’s parent company, Alphabet, shut down Makani. The company said, “Despite strong technical progress, the road to commercialization is longer and riskier than hoped,” according to Wikipedia.

Wrightspeed and Google/Makani both had options to buy their buildings, a clause that turned out to be worthless and placed the future of Alameda Point infrastructure in their hands, not the City’s.

Alameda Post - the inside of Hanger 11 at alameda point
Interior of Hangar 11, formerly used by Makani, which is outfitted with 8,000 amps of available carbon-free electricity. The City wants to lease the building rather than sell. Photo Richard Bangert.

City is repeating the past, expecting different results

Vacant Building 11, Makani’s former digs, is a highly desirable commercial and light-industrial building with a clear span roof and a carbon-free electrical supply that is four times the capacity that is typical for a building this size. But rather than seek out a buyer who might potentially offer around $20 million, which could be used for new street infrastructure, the City instead has been negotiating a lease.

They first tried to lease Building 11 to Science Corp., a medical device company, but that didn’t pass City Council approval due to animal testing. Now they are negotiating a lease with another startup company called Wisk Aero, whose parent company Boeing could easily afford to purchase the building.

What is City staff’s rationale for again rolling the dice that a startup will be successful and buy the building some day? They first wanted to sell a different building at the other end of the street once occupied by Wrightspeed. But the Navy still owns that building due to a thorny cleanup issue. The City one day—who knows when—wants to use those sale proceeds to fund infrastructure on the streets next to Building 11. Supposedly this will make Building 11 worth more before selling it. Unfortunately, this strategy involves leasing the building for another 10 years, while aging infrastructure deteriorates and costs escalate.

Second, the infrastructure on the streets next to Building 11, and those nearby, could be funded by the sale of this building. Modern streets could be built where sideshows are now staged. If Boeing were to buy—rather than lease—the building to house its startup company Wisk Aero and the company were to go belly up, the building would still be worth more than what Boeing paid for it, after proceeds from the sale funded new streets.

Instead of trying to get this property off the City’s books and onto the tax rolls, with sales proceeds funneled into building new streets and utilities, the City wants to continue the risky strategy of tying Alameda Point’s future to another new company that has posted no profits.

Alameda Post - an aerial photo of buildings at Alameda Point
Only one building in this photo, at top left, is privately owned. The other hangars in the background on Monarch St. are leased. The Bachelor Enlisted Quarters complex in the center remains a slug property, which no one wants to buy and rehab, and the City refuses to consider alternatives. The building on the left is still owned by the Navy. Photo Richard Bangert

Infrastructure replacement treading water

Some recent numbers help make the point that the City’s pace of selling property is unsustainable. In 2014, when the Alameda Point Master Infrastructure Plan was adopted, total cost of new infrastructure was estimated at a little under $600 million. By March 2023, just nine years later, the City estimated the total cost had risen to $700 million in its Leasing and Selling Presentation. During this same time period, commitments were made to fund roughly $130 million in new infrastructure, barely outpacing inflation.

With a scant inventory of valuable buildings to sell to fund infrastructure, the City is again planning to forfeit the opportunity to sell Building 11 for the foreseeable future. Continuing on this road of hand-picking tenants is a luxury the City can no longer afford. It’s time to start aggressively selling more property and handpicking buyers.

The City should stick to providing services, not running a business park.

Contributing writer Richard Bangert posts stories and photos about environmental issues on his blog Alameda Point Environmental Report. His writing is collected at

Editorials and Letters to the Editor

All opinions expressed on this page are the author's alone and do not reflect those of the Alameda Post, nor does our organization endorse any views the author may present. Our objective as an independent news source is to fully reflect our community's varied opinions without giving preference to a particular viewpoint.

If you disagree with an opinion that we have published, please submit a rebuttal or differing opinion in a letter to the Editor for publication. Review our policies page for more information.

KQED Curated Content

Support our mission to provide trustworthy news and information for Alameda every day.